I grew up being patriotic,
saying the Pledge at school every morning and getting teary when I sang The
Star Spangled Banner. I remember during the war we talked about if we won,
everyone in the world would be free. However, if the Germans won, they would
enslave us. No wonder we prayed for our troops each night and especially for
our cousins who were serving in the War.
I truly believed this was
a land choice above all other lands and that God loved us the best.
It was at Sunstone, where
a multitude of views are expressed, that I first came to understand that
everyone on the face of the earth is a child of God and He loves all His
children equally. Even though, I'm extremely humbled and grateful to live in the land of the free and the home of the brave, I never felt the same
about singing “God Bless America” again. I think Tiny Tim got it right when he
exclaimed: “God Bless Us Everyone”.
With this background, Holly
Richardson’s article in the Salt Lake Tribune on August 4, 2018, struck a tender chord with me.
Holly
Richardson: How can God-given rights only apply to Americans?
“We
hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they
are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among those
are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
Those
words from the Declaration of Independence ring down through the ages. I have
heard dozens — hundreds, maybe, of speeches that point to this fundamental
belief that lies at the bedrock of our nation’s founding — that everyone —
EVERYONE - has rights that come to them by God and that those rights cannot be
granted by any government.
In
fact, the Declaration of Independence goes on to say further that whenever
those rights have been so trampled on and usurped, it is the right of the
people to create a government that will protect those rights for all.
Oddly
missing from this Declaration is the caveat “unless you were born in another
country” or “unless you seeking refuge from abuse and terror.” So why are there
so many in this nation willing to look down from their lofty towers and
proclaim that unalienable rights from God come only to those born in the United
States of America? How arrogant.
On
our southern border, asylum seekers are turned away without an opportunity to
petition the courts for safety. Eyewitnesses and advocates visiting
the Brownsville-Matamoros International Bridge between Mexico and the U.S. in
June met Laura and her 6-year-old son Nicolas. She was fleeing a violent police
officer husband whose colleagues turned the other way when she sought help. She
came to follow the legal process the United States outlined — enter the country
and request asylum.
However,
the officers on the bridge were not allowing anyone to complete the first step
— enter the U.S. “They keep telling me to go come back later, that there is no
room for people like me (asylum seekers), and that I should try again in five
or six hours,” Laura explained. “But I have been here for three days, along
with these other people waiting here, and no one gets in.”
According
to those same eyewitnesses, the supervisor was confronted about a mother and
child who had been sitting on the bridge for days and his response was a
chilling, “I don’t really care.”
Where
are the unalienable rights for Laura and Nicolas?
As
I’ve written before, the worldwide refugee crisis is expanding. On average,
someone is driven from their home every two seconds.
The
Trump administration is now considering cutting the number of refugees admitted
to the United States by 40 percent, down to just 25,000 per year. For some context,
Bangladesh has a million or more refugees, Germany has almost a million and
Turkey has 3.5 million refugees. But the U.S. can only “handle” 25,000?
Where
are the refugees' unalienable rights? Should they not be able to seek refuge in
a place where they can at least hope for a measure of peace?
For
those who say that rights only extend to those who are citizens of the United
States: You are wrong. The Founding Fathers declared their natural rights came
from God long before they had a United States to belong to. More recently, the
U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Zadvydas v. Davis (2001) that “due process” of the
14th Amendment applies to all aliens in the United States whose presence may be
or is "unlawful, involuntary or transit.”
The
court also ruled in Almeida-Sanchez v. United States (1973) that all criminal
charge-related elements of the Constitution’s amendments (the First, Fourth,
Fifth, Sixth and the 14th) including search and seizure, self-incrimination,
trial by jury and due process, protect non-citizens, legally or illegally
present. Saying that unalienable rights depend on where you were born and that
they stop at the border — which something created by governments and not by God
— is segregation. It’s the new way of claiming to be “Separate but equal.”
If
you believe that God has granted you rights that cannot be granted by
government, but you also believe that those rights only extend to the border, I
would suggest that you do not in fact, believe in the Constitution, unalienable
rights or the Founding Fathers vision for this country. You cannot have it both
ways.
No comments:
Post a Comment